Lincoln Electric Venturing Abroad Essay - 3538 Words

Lincoln Electric Executive Summary Michael Gillespie, The Lincoln Electric Company’s new president for the Asia Region, was â€Å"encouraged to develop plans to open welding consumables factories in several Asian countries† by the new CEO, Anthony Massaro, and Gillespie had specifically â€Å"turned his attention to plans for Indonesia [O’Connell,[1] main reference, p 1].† We worked with Gillespie to prepare for the September 1996 meeting with Massaro and the presidents of the other worldwide regions. We analyzed Lincoln’s current capabilities and its past experiences and prepared a transformative plan based on business concept innovation [Hamel[2], ch 3], documented by this report, with a three pronged approach for the Asia Region. The first†¦show more content†¦2. Lincoln needed continued organizational development just as Lincoln’s equipment needed continued maintenance to remain viable. James Lincoln was a principled visionary and an organizational development inn ovator[d]. However, he did not prepare successors for assuming the critical role that continued organizational development. Neither of his successors, first William Irrgang and later Georges Willis, had contributed anything of note in developing the organization to meet Lincoln’s changing environmental demands. In particular, during Willis’s tenure, Lincoln did not even practice organizational maintenance: â€Å"By 1992, nearly all of the newly acquired plants, plus France, were operating in the red [and corporate executives] paid little attention [p 7].†Lincoln needed to develop the Asian organization and to develop the entirety ofLincoln as a wholly integrated organization in order to meet the demands of its expansion effort. 3. Lincoln’s culture could not be imposed but must be nurtured. â€Å"Willis retained the existing managers of most of the acquired companies to take advantage of their local knowledge, but directed them to implement [underlined by author]Lincoln’s incentive and manufacturing systems [p 6].† While Willis appreciated the benefits of implementing Lincoln’s systems, he did not consider James Lincoln’s caveat that â€Å"All those involved must be satisfied that they are properly recognized or they will not cooperate – andShow MoreRelatedCase Study Analysis Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad1533 Words   |  7 PagesLincoln Electric (LE) has been a producer of electrical and welding technology products since the late 1800s. The company remained primarily a family and employee held company until 1995, then approximately 40% of its equity went to the public. James Lincoln, one of the founders, developed unique management techniques that effectivel y motivated the employees. These management techniques were implemented as an unusual (for the era) structure of compensation and benefits called incentive managementRead MoreLincoln Assignment Essay749 Words   |  3 Pagesï » ¿Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad Discussion Questions: 1. How was Lincoln able to grow and prosper for so long in such a difficult commodity industry that forced out other giants such as General Electric, Westinghouse, and BOC? What is the source of Lincoln’s outstanding and enduring success? 2. Given this outstanding success, why did the internationalization thrust of the late 1980s and early 1990s fail? 3. What is your evaluation of the company’s internationalization strategy underRead MoreLincoln Electric 873 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction Lincoln Electric (LE) is a worldwide leader in production of welding equipment with more than US$1 billion in sales and 6,000 workers. John C. Lincoln designed and made an electric motor with a $200 investment in 1895. Today, members of the Lincoln family own more than 60 percent of the stock. The Lincoln Management System Lincoln Electric’s management system is so successful that other businesses use it as a benchmark. They have effectively used feedback type control to achieve theirRead MoreStrategy Assignment : Lincoln Electric2135 Words   |  9 PagesStrategy Assignment : Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad 1. Lincolns competitive advantage lies mainly in its effective compensation and benefits system which put forth three main elements to spearhead the companys efforts. The trinity of elements comprised of piecework, bonus system and guaranteed employment. Piecework provided workers with a sense of autonomy in that now, workers can earn as much as they are willing to work for. The bonus levels in Lincoln far exceeded those of industry peersRead MoreKeeping Google googley3957 Words   |  16 Pages45(4): 20-34. 2. Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad (HBS case #9-409-039) 3. Infosys (A): Strategic Human Resource Management (HBS case #9-412-029) California PREPARATION QUESTIONS FOR LINCOLN ELECTRIC CASE ï‚ · ï‚ · ï‚ · ï‚ · ï‚ · How has Lincoln sustained success in a highly competitive, commodity industry? Why did Lincoln’s internationalization efforts in the 80s and 90s fail? Will Massaro’s internationalization strategy be more successful? Why or why not? Should Lincoln proceed with the investmentRead MoreCase Studies: Sas Airline Ryanair80169 Words   |  321 Pages5 Sinha, D. (1999) The Regulation and Deregulation of US Airlines, The Journal of Transport History, 20(1), p. 46 6 Sine, W. David, R. (2003) Environmental Jolts, Institutional Change, and the Creation of Entrepreneurial Opportunity in the US Electric Power Industry, Research Policy, p. 187-188 7 Erber G. and Horn M, (2000), Economic Bulletin, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, p. 213-214 8 Shane, S., (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar, p. 156-157 9 Erber G. and Horn M, (2000)Read MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesmoral judgment stories were administered to college students who had earlier participated in Milgram’s (1963) obedience study. Under the guise of a reinforcement-learning experiment, Milgram’s subjects had been directed to give increasingly intense electric shocks to a person who was observed to be in great pain. Of the respondents at the principled level (stages 5 and 6), 75 percent refused to administer the shocks (i.e., to hurt someone), while only 12.5 percent of the respondents at the conformity